<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The discovery blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog</link>
	<description>Semantico looks at online publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The value chain strikes back: Google and the history of copyright by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/02/the-value-chain-strikes-back-google-and-the-history-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-31839</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=1101#comment-31839</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Andy. 
Clearly you don&#039;t agree with Lord Camden, and neither do I. Personally, I&#039;m with Johnson: &#039;No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money.&#039; Any writer with a mortgage would agree. However I don&#039;t think Google&#039;s professed idealism - eg its mission to organise the world&#039;s knowledge - is all weasel words (unlike Lord Camden&#039;s). I think there&#039;s a genuine tension between the need to protect IP rights and the desire of the information to be free. Intellectual property as a concept is troublesome and we&#039;re seeing these philosophical difficulties played out as legal dramas (it&#039;s the American way). I&#039;m planning to touch on this in a follow-up post to this one about piracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Andy.<br />
Clearly you don&#8217;t agree with Lord Camden, and neither do I. Personally, I&#8217;m with Johnson: &#8216;No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money.&#8217; Any writer with a mortgage would agree. However I don&#8217;t think Google&#8217;s professed idealism &#8211; eg its mission to organise the world&#8217;s knowledge &#8211; is all weasel words (unlike Lord Camden&#8217;s). I think there&#8217;s a genuine tension between the need to protect IP rights and the desire of the information to be free. Intellectual property as a concept is troublesome and we&#8217;re seeing these philosophical difficulties played out as legal dramas (it&#8217;s the American way). I&#8217;m planning to touch on this in a follow-up post to this one about piracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iBooks or Apps? The publisher&#8217;s dilemma by ediciona.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ¿Vender en iPhone App Store o en iBookstore? Una comparativa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/02/ibooks-or-apps-the-publishers-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-31765</link>
		<dc:creator>ediciona.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ¿Vender en iPhone App Store o en iBookstore? Una comparativa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=1138#comment-31765</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía The discovery blog &#8220;iBooks or Apps? The publishers dilema&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía The discovery blog &#8220;iBooks or Apps? The publishers dilema&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iBooks or Apps? The publisher&#8217;s dilemma by This Week in the Blogs: February 21 &#8211; February 27, 2010 — The Book Designer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/02/ibooks-or-apps-the-publishers-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-31748</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in the Blogs: February 21 &#8211; February 27, 2010 — The Book Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=1138#comment-31748</guid>
		<description>[...] Padley on The Discovery Blog iBooks or Apps? The publishers dilemma &#8220;With the launch of the iPad and the iBookstore Apple have given publishers another option [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Padley on The Discovery Blog iBooks or Apps? The publishers dilemma &#8220;With the launch of the iPad and the iBookstore Apple have given publishers another option [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Challenge of Online Identity: Part 2 by Education Tay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2009/11/the-challenge-of-online-identity-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31738</link>
		<dc:creator>Education Tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=764#comment-31738</guid>
		<description>Open ID usage with web 2.0 is on the increase and I have used it a fair amount, especially through blogs.  Identity management and the saving of a person’s identity to be used for other website using the same web 2.0 technology would be beneficial. Saving time when creating new passwords or profiles from website to website would help, although Open ID is not that widely used at present.  An issue with the management software could be security and possible unwanted posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open ID usage with web 2.0 is on the increase and I have used it a fair amount, especially through blogs.  Identity management and the saving of a person’s identity to be used for other website using the same web 2.0 technology would be beneficial. Saving time when creating new passwords or profiles from website to website would help, although Open ID is not that widely used at present.  An issue with the management software could be security and possible unwanted posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The value chain strikes back: Google and the history of copyright by Andy Laties</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/02/the-value-chain-strikes-back-google-and-the-history-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-31663</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Laties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=1101#comment-31663</guid>
		<description>Your marvelous essay seems to elide the emotional, rhetorical aspect 
of the argument.

Compare Google&#039;s recent assertions about the violable nature of authors&#039; copyrights to the great Whig lawyer, Lord Camden who in 1774, successfully fought to destroy the existing tradition of copyright and combined Pope&#039;s opinion of the generality of booksellers with his own aristocratic scorn of the man who made his living by the pen. &quot;Knowledge&quot;, declared Lord Camden, &quot;has no value or use for the solitary owner: to be enjoyed it must be communicated.... Glory is the reward of science, and those who deserve it scorn all meaner views: I speak not of the scribblers for bread, who tease the press with their wretched productions; fourteen years is too long a privilege for their perishable trash. It was not for gain that Bacon, Newton, Milton, and Locke instructed and delighted the world; it would be unworthy such men to traffic with a dirty bookseller. When the bookseller offered Milton five pounds for his Paradise Lost, he did not reject it and commit it to the flames, nor did he accept the miserable pittance as the reward of his labour; he knew that the real price of his work was immortality, and that posterity would pay it.&quot; -Frank Mumby, &quot;Publishing and Bookselling: A History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day&quot; (1954. London. Jonathan Cape.) 190-1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your marvelous essay seems to elide the emotional, rhetorical aspect<br />
of the argument.</p>
<p>Compare Google&#8217;s recent assertions about the violable nature of authors&#8217; copyrights to the great Whig lawyer, Lord Camden who in 1774, successfully fought to destroy the existing tradition of copyright and combined Pope&#8217;s opinion of the generality of booksellers with his own aristocratic scorn of the man who made his living by the pen. &#8220;Knowledge&#8221;, declared Lord Camden, &#8220;has no value or use for the solitary owner: to be enjoyed it must be communicated&#8230;. Glory is the reward of science, and those who deserve it scorn all meaner views: I speak not of the scribblers for bread, who tease the press with their wretched productions; fourteen years is too long a privilege for their perishable trash. It was not for gain that Bacon, Newton, Milton, and Locke instructed and delighted the world; it would be unworthy such men to traffic with a dirty bookseller. When the bookseller offered Milton five pounds for his Paradise Lost, he did not reject it and commit it to the flames, nor did he accept the miserable pittance as the reward of his labour; he knew that the real price of his work was immortality, and that posterity would pay it.&#8221; -Frank Mumby, &#8220;Publishing and Bookselling: A History from the Earliest Times to the Present Day&#8221; (1954. London. Jonathan Cape.) 190-1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online publishing tech buzz 2010 by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/01/online-publishing-tech-buzz-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-31582</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=943#comment-31582</guid>
		<description>Clearly, I&#039;m in the cloud - or is that just old-fashioned marketing smoke and mirrors ..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, I&#8217;m in the cloud &#8211; or is that just old-fashioned marketing smoke and mirrors ..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online publishing, e-learning and knowledge management – Part 2 by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2009/12/online-publishing-e-learning-and-knowledge-management-%e2%80%93-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31580</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=888#comment-31580</guid>
		<description>Thanks for feedback - hope they repay closer attention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for feedback &#8211; hope they repay closer attention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The value chain strikes back: Google and the history of copyright by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/02/the-value-chain-strikes-back-google-and-the-history-of-copyright/comment-page-1/#comment-31579</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=1101#comment-31579</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online publishing, e-learning and knowledge management – Part 2 by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2009/12/online-publishing-e-learning-and-knowledge-management-%e2%80%93-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31578</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=888#comment-31578</guid>
		<description>I agree about the underlying technologies being the same - and much else besides. Working across digital industries I see many similarities in tech, concepts, skillsets, and the business issues supplier companies have in these different markets. It&#039;s the jargon that&#039;s completely different!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the underlying technologies being the same &#8211; and much else besides. Working across digital industries I see many similarities in tech, concepts, skillsets, and the business issues supplier companies have in these different markets. It&#8217;s the jargon that&#8217;s completely different!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online publishing tech buzz 2010 by John Helmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/2010/01/online-publishing-tech-buzz-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-31577</link>
		<dc:creator>John Helmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/?p=943#comment-31577</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Gartner&#039;s assessment, Pradip. I must admit it puzzled me a bit, but then remember that this is solely about hype - ie the coverage of new devices/services tends to be adulatory until it reaches a point of saturation, and then the negative stories and views start appearing. This process often bears no relation to commercial reality or even adoption. In this case, also, Gartner might have been anticipating that the release of Apple&#039;s iPad - a launch that has been in the rumour mill for some time - would be a big negative for e-readers. Thanks for your reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Gartner&#8217;s assessment, Pradip. I must admit it puzzled me a bit, but then remember that this is solely about hype &#8211; ie the coverage of new devices/services tends to be adulatory until it reaches a point of saturation, and then the negative stories and views start appearing. This process often bears no relation to commercial reality or even adoption. In this case, also, Gartner might have been anticipating that the release of Apple&#8217;s iPad &#8211; a launch that has been in the rumour mill for some time &#8211; would be a big negative for e-readers. Thanks for your reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
